use the back browser to return to previous section

The Discipline Contract

After the self-discipline has been installed and become normal, other people may be included, if you both want to. You s should never actually depend upon another, and you should always be able to let such relationships go without disruption.

There is a danger here. You are a great big grown up boy now, and responsible for your own behavior. You must not abnegate that responsibility. For this reason, and to avoid misunderstandings, relationships of this kind must be governed by agreement, preferably in the form of a written contract. I am providing a discipline contract as an example; please feel free to use it as it is, or to adapt it however you wish. This is a spiritual teaching and is given to you feely, without any obligation on your part, even of attribution.

The most important provision of the contract is the principle that it may be terminated at a moment’s notice, even retroactively. This protects you against losing control of your own behavior. But if you end the agreement for a wrong reason (i.e. your behind hurts or whatever), then that is certainly on your game karma, and what goes around comes around, bucky boy.

But now that you have learned how to use the self-applied equipment, and have had enough experience with it that it seems somewhat natural, you are also equipped to have spanking relationships with other people who are not physically present. You need only a cell-phone or an internet chatroom or even just email, to have enough communication that you can be ordered to apply a specified punishment, and in this day and age only a few hundred dollars worth of equipment enables you to capture that in streaming video and email it to the discipliner for his approval.

Before giving the contract, it is necessary to list what I call the fourteen satanic perversities of the discipline:

1. The Fourteen Perversities

01. That the discipline is sexual (masturbatory or fetishistic or a reversion to pre-frontal low bottomy)

02. That the discipline is a power situation, or based upon mental superiority

03. That the discipline is recreational

04. That the discipline represents a submission to group-soul, or the social system

05. That the discipline is a reversion to juvenility, and/or that adult powers, privileges, prerogatives, and properties are forfeited by the disciplinee

06. That the administrator of the discipline exercises parental authority over the disciplinee

07. That to accept the discipline is to acknowledge defeat in one or more of one’s ego conflicts or life-games

08. That the discipline extends to matters of life responsibility, or affects major life-games such as money

09. That the criterion of submission is maturity, instead of attitude, morality, humility, degree of disciplinedness, etc.

10. That the discipline is analogous, and represents punitive consequenses on a more meaningful life-level

11. That the disciplinary arrangement involves a submission of mental processes, or that the disciplined person becomes subject to the tinkerings of those who claim to be mind-smiths or the like

12. That to accept the discipline indicates that one is characterizable by the term “mistaken one”, or that one is a “wrong person”

13. That the discipline involves the acceptance of other-controlledness mode in one's physical or mental actions by the disciplinee whose locus of control is self-control

14. That the discipline involves ulterior purpose such as fueling or mentation

A relationship shall exist between A and B in which A disciplines B as he wishes. It is agreed that the Eternal Godhead and/or the Buddha selves in Nirvana shall be the authority in the relationship, and that in cases of remote psychic relationships the actions of impersonators shall be negated, and the actions of the true principals affirmed. It is also agreed that the relationship will be ruled by right motivation, and that right motivation in discipline is always to make the subject be a good, obedient boy or girl. B agrees to obey A for the specified term, such that disobedience becomes sinful for him, and to get over it whenever he is told to, gracefully, naturally, obediently, passively, and submissively, and to adjust his position as directed. If a term is not specified, it shall be assumed to be for not more than one day. A agrees to not subject the relationship to his own obedience superior, such that the discipliner would become, for practical purposes, anyone but he. The discipline shall not take the form of, nor embody the spirit of, any of the enumerated satanic perversities, given just above this contract. A shall not be considered to be a participant in B’s functioning in his life-games such as money-making work, or his art. B shall continue to be regarded as self-controlled and the master of himself and of his own mind -- it is only that of his own free will he submits to A as a discipliner. But all of the disciplines shall be on the order of slapping, spanking, paddling, cleaning stuff up, writing a punishment statement multiple times, washing the mouth out with soap, restricting indulgences, curtailing privileges, requiring prayer, requiring physical exercises, syringing, confinement to quarters, penal servitude, early bedtimes, going without blankets, being grounded, and other disciplines of like nature. A does not overrule B in any of his decisions. B continues to be regarded as the decision-maker. If B’s ordinary locus of control is self-control, the nature of the discipline relationship is not to subject him to other-controlledness mode. Civic authorities, or the apparatuses of the civil system, are never used or represented. Punishment cannot take the form of subjecting the disciplinee to an adversary whom he has defeated or with whom he is vying, or making him vulnerable to the presence of such adversary. B continues to be regarded as the maker of his own mind and does not submit to the making of A or another, or others. B cannot be punished by A for his conduct during disrelated life-games, unless that conduct specifically violates disciplinary admonition, such as to not use bad language, in which case the behavior would be disobedience, and richly deserving of punishment. A may strike B publically. B will not hit himself publically at psychic behest, but will on overt command from physically present discipliner. A will not wodify, nor will he punish B during gig-work hours. B’s stated principles, for example the fact that he has excluded certain egos from his mental makeup such that they are not allowed in his phychic life as ego-presences, will not be contradicted unless A makes him submit on a given principle. A may use punishment for this purpose to test the strength of will behind the principle. This contract is terminable by either party at a moment’s notice, even retroactively. It is agreed that breaches of the contract by either party will be punished by the 13-34, one step for the first breach, two for the second etc. up to thirteen. A and B signify the commencement of the contract by each praying: “I agree to the terms of this contract with ______ and also pray to God or the Buddha selves in Nirvana, or both, in unison with him, that any phychic impersonator in this relationship be thoroughly punished.”