use the back browser to return to previous section 
return to Book I 
 
 
 
Applications of Spanking Discipline 
 
         
         Our destiny from life to life is a product of our behavior.  Better behavior will produce better destiny, although some of it is due to lessons that we need to learn. 
 
         Here are some inspirational signs.  Click here.  If you put one of them in a place where you will see it frequently during the day, I think you will find that in one year’s time, it will have affected you powerfully. 
 
        The mind plays tricks.  Often we should spank but we don't.  Here is a prayer to help you get over that hump. 
 
 
The Self-Control That Uses Spanking 
 
          There are three elements of the self-control that uses spanking.  These are the desire, the will, and the bloke.  Desire is the yin part; will is the yang part, and the bloke is the bloke.  In this control, desire is the obedient boy of the bloke, and can be made to obediently build a desire to any level.  The will is also the obedient boy of the bloke, and can be made to build what it feels like doing to any level.  You would want to have a strong, robust spirit of obedience.  That spirit can be built and strengthened by using the vehicle
 
          Desire is the plow.  Will is merely the water that flows in the furrow cut by the plow.  Desire is the only key to real will power, but desire can be made to manifest by will. 
 
          An act of will, based on a decision by the bloke, can be initiated at either desire or will.  Either one of them can dominate the other powerfully; neither cares which is dominating.  They are a team; they work together to make happen what the bloke desires to happen. 
 
          This way cuts through the tendency of the mind to play tricks in thes area.  Let’s say you ought to be spanked.  You did something, or failed to do something, or allowed your standard to fall. 
 
          Will turns to mind and says, “Okay, you’re gonna get one.  Start wanting to be spanked.” 
          “I want to be spanked.”  (heartfelt, focused, obedient.) 
          “Harder.  More focused, more intense, more sincere, more heartfelt.” 
          “I WANT TO BE SPANKED!”  (concentrates on really meaning it, and addressing the will directly.) 
          This continues until the will is satisfied that the desire is strong enough. 
 
          “Then what do you want me to do?” 
          “Spank me.” 
          “How hard?” 
          “Six hard ones, with wrist action, right on the bare sweet spot, while I’m over the meditation seat.” 
 
          Now you know perfectly well that when something is desired in there, you provide it.  You do it all the time.  So if desire is strong enough, and genuine enough, what it wants you will give it..  You must learn to self-assess the strength of the desire, and competently increase it to the effective level. 
 
Being a God Boy 
 
          The parenting that children receive is an abstraction of life in the cosmos.  What parents do to children, the cosmos is doing to each and every one of us all of the time, but so slowly that we cannot perceive it. 
 
          So in all fairness, people are given at the start of a life, an intense and vivid experience of what the cosmos will be doing to them.  The parenting of children is only for children, but what we are doing here is creating a similar abstraction, for the purpose of shaping ourselves into the way that we would prefer to be. 
 
          In this sense, being a good boy is the key to the cosmos; the key to life.  The way given here is one of taking control of your own destiny.  If life seems undesirable, that’s not life -- that’s you.  Change you, and you change life. 
 
The Demerit System 
 
        Demerits stay on your record for one week, by the clock, and it is good to record them in an electronic organizer or a computer file.  You can have two demerits at any given time without further consequence.  But if you get a third demerit, the third demerit is not all you get.  It calls for 1 unit, after spanking to the punishment point.  The fourth 2 units.  Pretty soon, it will make you behave.  (Do not exceed 2 units after the punishment point is reached, on any given day.  If you are due more than 2, allow 1 day to intervene before the next application of 1 or 2 after the point is reached.) 
 
        Now you will notice, as you take control over your own behavior in this way, that there will be little tricks on the part of the imps that have thought of themselves as controlling your behavior.  You will note that often, when you have two demerits, an atypical inconsistency with the rules will appear.  It will seem quite natural, but it will be an infraction that does not usually appear.  That is an attempt to trick you into overuse of the discipline, or to give you the feeling that you are being manipulated for someone else’s amusement.  Here the same discernment that a wise parent has about the behavior of a child is called for.  It is quite proper to ignore such anomalous lapses, and to not give the third demerit if you feel that it is such a trick.  If they really fight you about it, it might sometimes be necessary to suspend the demerit system altogether.  That’s all right.  It is important to self-parent wisely, with common sense, and not become legalistic, or some kind of martinet.  Sometimes it is necessary to suspend the entire discipline, when one's defenses are being sorely tried.  When in doubt, ‘whip-it’ out. 
 
         Especially when you are well endowed, there will be a tendency to trick you into spanking, to facilitate usurping your current properties.  You can win that one by postponing the punishment, up to a week or more.  In that context, you can easily choose the most strategic time.  Simply make the mind remember when it committed the offense. 
 
        When you adopt the discipline, you will notice a tendency in group power to attempt to relegate you to child-status, and to assert that it may discipline you.  Further, it will try to address you as a disciplined entity.  Do not permit this.  To address a self-disciplined person as the disciplined rather than the disciplining unit gives great offense.  This is why we have the social convention of addressing people as ‘monseur’, ‘signor’, or ‘mister’.  Other people must give you that respect.  If they deny it to you and attempt to usurp your seniority, you will win that game if you insist upon it.  It might become necessary to take the victory in such cases in order to discourage such annoyance.  You may prefer to warn them that you will do this if necessary. 
 
        Invariably, one meets with assumptions from the world at large that one is a “son”.  This is an attempt to usurp the control of the self-controlled person.  The implication is that someone else is playing the role of “father” or “mother”, and that one is indeed subject, that one has indeed submitted.  The use of spanking is by no means necessarily based upon parenting; it is archetypal, not parental, and the parental version is based on the same archetype.  Parents have the dharma of introducing their children to it because it is the best way to discipline the human form. 
 
        The process of controlling your own behavior calls for making rules, and these should be kept in a notebook or computer-file, password protected since it is none of anybody else’s business.  Simply start such a file, and when you think of a rule you want to make, inscribe it, and begin enforcing it by the demerit system.  What’s a good rule?  That is entirely up to you.  I think the first rule I made was “silverware clean”.  Being a typical American male who lived alone, I never cleaned my silverware, and over the years the few pieces I owned had become deeply and interestingly encrusted with molds of various kinds.  Once in a while I would pick up the fork or the spoon and stare in mystified fascination at the intricate and ornate patterns that had formed, it never once occurring to me that I should actually clean the pieces.  Needless to say, making the rule solved that problem. 
 
        Just make a rule when it occurs to you that you need one.  It’s your life and your human, and you have more control over it than you ever could over your child.  God is the ruler of the universe, but only you are the ruler of your behavior.  Reign. 
 
 
The Rule System 
 
        After using the demerit system for a number of years, it evolved into the rule system.  This is especially good for instituting new rules or behaviors.  Any behavior which becomes desired or undesired you make into a rule, the punishment for infracting of which is a 1 -- one paddle whack unit on the bare bent bottom, over the meditation seat. 
 
        If you forget to keep the rule, you get the one unit, but the punishment is increased to two units.  If you go one week without breaking the rule again, it goes back to one.  But if you break it again within a week, you get the two and it is increased to three.  Again, if you go a week without breaking it, the punishment is reduced to two, but if you don’t, it’s increased to four. 
 
        The progression is: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, second step of the 13-34, third, fourth... all the way up to thirteen.  Then it starts again at one.  Behaviors or non-behaviors that you want to institute can be easily and readily installed by this system. 
 
 
The Vehicle 
A Way of Dichotomous Self-Control 
 
        Spanking discipline conduces to a very obedient way of being.  What is produced when this way of discipline has become ingrained and habitual, is a vehicle -- a unique vehicle.  For one thing, it can be entirely self-controlled, and can function on extremely low energy.  I call it the supposedtomobile. 
 
        When energy gets low, we have enough to think or to do, but not both at once.  So first we think, then we decide, then we issue an oarder, then we do.  We obey the oarder. 
 
        Sometimes it's fun to assume a personality for the order-giver -- the sort of person that you enjoy obeying.  You can even give it a name (the one I use is Corporal Startnow). 
 
        An oarder can be very complex, and consist of a number of things that you want done.  After you have given the oarder, utter the phrase “start now”.  This activates the backfield-in-motion rule.  Then you shift to doing, and begin obediently performing the task(s) you have been given.  Now here is the key rule: Once the phrase has been uttered, your backfield (buns) are in motion.  And there shall be no instance of dawdling until the entire list of tasks has been completed, or it’s a 7. 
 
        But note that the tasks need not be done in order, because of the intervening task rule.  Any intervening task may be performed at any time, as long as the backfield remains in motion until it’s all done.  Often, when you begin doing stuff, you will think of some other things that you want to do.  You may include them in the sequence anywhere you want.  You can get a lot accomplished while your backfield is in motion, but remember that it must remain in motion until everything you have been told to do is completed.  Otherwise, you get the punishment. 
 
        Decisions should be made promptly, and hesitating in indecision should be reduced to a minimum.  When we are indecisive, the subconscious mind is pursuing several alternatives, exploring them and evaluating their consequences.  This takes a lot of energy.  But when a decision is made, this energy is called back in, empowering us.  In Bhagavad Gita, Krishna says to Arjuna, “Many-branched and indeed endless are the buddhis of the irresolute.” 
 
        The supposedtomobile makes decisions by means a digital timer that you set for one minute, and then it rings.  Whenever you have a decision to make, you set the timer for one minute, and order your mind thusly: “You make this decision before the bell rings, or you are getting a 7.”  Personally, I have never failed to make the decision before the bell rang.  If it’s close enough that it’s a difficult choice, it usually doesn’t matter much which alternative you select. 
 
        The milieu of the vehicle, paradoxically, is self-controlled freedom, although within that context you play the pleasant game of obedience with a loved one.  Attacks upon it, in the form of implications of other-controlledness, are to be firmly defeated and turned back. 
 
 
 
The 13-34 
 
        There was a time at which I was using quite a lot of spanking in my discipline, and it happened that over the course of 34 days, I got 13 of them.  With the paddle.  I’ll provide a chart which will depict the pattern graphically, but it was day 1 (7), day 3 (7), day 5 (7), day 7 (3), day 13 (7), day 15 (7), day 17 (7), day 21 (7), day 22 (7), day 26 (5), day 28 (3), day 30 (3), day 34 (4). 
 
        On the 36th day, I had an interesting experience.  I broke down and was given over completely into the throes of an obedience passion that I had never before known in my life.  I pleaded to do the will of what was punishing me.  I was completely consumed by a desperate desire to obey, and to be the way it was desired that I be.  I came to call this reaction “the gold response.”  This was an unprecedented event in my life, and as the months and now years unfolded, I began to realize what had happened. 
 
        For one thing, I was never the same after that. 
 
        There are a few activities that humans engage in that seem to draw, discernibly, higher-world presences.  One of these is the hunt, one of them is wrestling, and probably one is war, although I have not observed war, and so cannot report directly. 
 
        Many years ago, commercial swordfishing was done in a very romantic and swashbuckling sort of way.  They had invented a gun that shot harpoons, but it wasn’t much good because the harpoon tended to bounce on the water.  What they found effective was to put a swordfish-stand on the prow of a 40-50 foot boat, with a railing around what they called the pulpit, at the end of a gangplank, and a man called a striker would get out there with his harpoon, which he called an iron, and they would drive the boat up on the swordfish, and he would heave his iron and spear it. 
        Apparently this was a pretty unique form of hunting in the cosmos, and when a boat would come in with 40 or so fish, and they were winching these 200-500 pound swordfish onto the dock, the fishermen would be full of higher-world hunters.  You could see it in their eyes; they would look larger, and curved like a minaret. 
 
        You see that in wrestlers’ eyes sometimes as well, particularly after a wrestler has been genuinely had, and has become what I call a wrest-ling.  They’re never really the same after that, after they’ve really been had. 
 
        I think that the experience made a spankling of me.  Essentially, this is how I explain what happened: The robot-mind is responsible for far more of our behavior than most people realize.  An example is regimens of running for exercise.  You start on a running regimen, and you’re full of determination, and it’s really enough determination, but it consumes a lot of energy, and after a week or two of it the robot-mind decides it has to go and something happens and you miss running.  Then something else happens and you miss it again.  A few weeks later, you think, “Hey, what happened to the running?”  But you don’t really have the will to resume it, and so it goes. 
 
        The robot-mind really largely controls our behavior most of the time.  It’s very subtle; it doesn’t let you know that it’s controlling you.  But the 13-34 frustrates it greatly.  Repeated paddlings successively break down the cell walls, but always the healing process begins.  Then you get another one, and the healing is destroyed and more damage is done.  The behind is a pretty important body part, physically.  You sit on it; you pivot on it sometimes; it has to be healed. 
 
        After a certain amount of this, the robot-mind becomes very frustrated and comes out of the closet and overtly controls you.  And it makes you yearn and beg to do the will of what is spanking you, and makes you more submissive than you have ever been in your life.  And you are never really the same after that happens.  Because you know in your heart of hearts that it can be done to you again.  And so you become more obedient, and easier to spank.  You become a spankling.  You realize as you never did before that this part of you can overtly control you, and that changes the self-identity concept that the ego has, because now it knows that it can be controlled. 
 
        Whether to undergo this experience is a decision that each must make for himself.  But for the record I have never regretted it.  I think that it made a better person of me.  More to the point, it has given me an immensely powerful weapon in the shaping of my own destiny.  If I threaten a 13-34 if certain behavior occurs, that behavior is terminated.  It no longer occurs.  And that includes a whole lot of interesting stuff, such as indulgence of lust or temptational thoughts.  The instinct of lust is primordial; it is a dinosaur.  But the fear of a 13-34 is a tyrannosaurus rex.  It eats dinosaurs for breakfast.  This punishment powerfully equips me to produce any level of behavior that I mandate, including eligibility for the desired heaven-world. 
 
        If there is ever any temptation toward disobedience, all I have to do is to think of the 13-34 (or some part of it -- a given number of steps of it), and a very powerful obedience arises within me.  Because I know what it would do to me.  I would become a little bit ego-weaker if I got another one of those, and I passionately do not desire that. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
        Once I was overworked and dieting, but close to making weight, at which point I could eat anything I wanted, and I really wanted some ice cream.  I also wanted to drink some whiskey, which I used to do because I was writing and I needed to unwind.  I got out of work late, made weight, ate a whole bunch of ice cream, and drank a whole lot of whiskey.  Due to the energy taxation, I became frankly drunk as a skunk.  I went to bed.  One of my first magnetos, from 35 years in the past, appeared in my mind as a psychic presence and took me over his knees, as had been his wont.  This additional unexpected forfeiture of control had the effect that I began to rut like a thirty-year-old, and indeed spilled, which was fairly normal behavior for me when I was thirty. 
 
        When I awoke the next morning, the first words out of my mouth were, “You’re getting a 13-34.”  These words I believe came from my higher self.  Over the course of the next 34 days, I administered the 13-34 conscientiously.  Toward the end, I experienced the gold response -- the intense and heartfelt desire to correct my behavior and to do the will of my punishing discipliner. 
 
        After a few months, without any conscious intention on my part, I began to say bitterly, “I hate alcohol. I hate it.”  I still find myself saying that from time to time.  And it is true.  I do hate alcohol.  I generally do not drink at all. 
 
        And I have never rutted since.  What I would describe as an Amazon woman appeared in my psychic life, and if I did not reject a sexual temptation quickly enough, she would pick up the paddle and waste my butt.  I’m talking hard, man.  Immediately. 
 
        There has not been a problem with sex since.  My rules state that if I make a submissive turnover without using the meditation seat, I will get five steps of the 13-34.  
 
 
Some Spiritual Applicatons 
 
        One of the most fruitful areas in which we may apply spanking discipline is that of chanting and meditation, in both of which practices the main problem (other than concentration power, which can be built through exercise) is the behavior of the mind.  The ego always tries to assert itself, and as long as it does, it consumes the mind-energy needed for higher realization.  This misbehavior responds very well to the proper use of the paddle. 
 
        For a long time, I used a behavior counter, such as a golf-score gizmo that you click, to keep track of my misbehaviors in chanting and meditation.  This had limited success -- the mind plays tricks.  Anymore, I keep a sawed-off fraternity paddle at hand, and if the behavior warrants it, the punishment is given immediately.  This has had much better results.  The sawed-off is lighter and handier than the self-applied, and you can stop, balance yourself on your left hand, and smack the bare behind, very, very quickly.  I generally give it a spanking with it if the misbehavior has warranted it.  Then you continue with the meditation or chant. 
 
         Another technique which can work better because it's quicker and easier, is to use the hairbrush paddle or the hairbrush hole paddle immediately on your bare thigh-top.  The subconscious mind is always thinking, 'How likely is mommy to actually do it,' and so this is more powerful because likelier. 
 
 
 
 
 
The sawed-off fraternity paddle 
 
 
 
 
 
 
administered with no pants or underwear 
 
A further evolution of the above technique can be found here.  This is the hairbrush paddle or the hairbrush hole paddle
 
        In theory, one of the advantages of becoming an obedient person in this way is that in time, the mind itself will acquire characteristics of obedient cooperation, and will become a better mind as you become a better person. 
 
        Right mindfulness is most importantly absence of wrong mindfulness.  For example any neurosis, such as paranoid delusion, becomes in this discipline a matter of misbehavior, and fully punishable disobedience.  Wrong mindfulness can be recognized by configuration.  Make the mind stop doing that. 
 
        If you are an obedient person, then your mind becomes an obedient mind.  Your mind is simply you on another level.  And if you tell the mind to stop doing something, and punish disobedience properly, the undesired behavior will cease. 
 
        However, in the case of long-standing habits that you want to break it is good to not punish too much.  If you do, it can sometimes bring about a compulsive cycle of disobedience and punishment, in which the mind seems to actively resist the change.  But if you punish firmly once, and then sometimes ignore lapses and other times give admonitions, as ‘come on, you know you aren’t supposed to do that’, the behavior will begin to be extinguished.  It is not good to be a martinet in discipline, but to be artful in its application.  After a few days, if compliance is slow, it might become appropriate to punish again. 
 
 
 
 
space line